Trump orders US to leave World Health Organization

Carrying out this executive action on day one makes it more likely the US will formally leave the global agency.

“They wanted us back so badly so we’ll see what happens,” Trump said in the Oval Office, referring to the WHO, perhaps hinting the US might return eventually.

The order said the US was withdrawing “due to the organization’s mishandling of the Covid-19 pandemic that arose out of Wuhan, China, and other global health crises, its failure to adopt urgently needed reforms, and its inability to demonstrate independence from the inappropriate political influence of WHO member states”.

The executive order also said the withdrawal was the result of “unfairly onerous payments” the US made to the WHO, which is part of the United Nations.

When Trump was still in office the first time around, he was critical of the organisation for being too “China-centric” in its tackling of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Trump accused the WHO of being biased towards China in how it issued guidance during the outbreak.

Under the Biden administration the US continued to be the largest funder of the WHO and in 2023 it contributed almost one-fifth of the agency’s budget.

The organisation’s annual budget is $6.8bn (£5.5bn).

It is possible that funding could disappear almost immediately, and it is not clear that other nations will step up to fill the gap. A US withdrawal could have an impact on WHO’s ability to respond to emergencies such as an Ebola outbreak, or MPOX – let alone another Covid-19-style pandemic.

Public health experts have suggested there could be other consequences for Americans’ health if progress is reversed on fighting infectious diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis, HIV and Aids.

Ashish Jha, who formerly worked as Covid-19 response co-ordinator under President Biden, previously warned leaving would “harm not only the health of people around the world, but also US leadership and scientific prowess”.

“It’s a cataclysmic presidential decision. Withdrawal is a grievous wound to world health, but a still deeper wound to the US,” Lawrence Gostin, a global public health expert and Georgetown University professor said.

There are also concerns that America’s withdrawal could ultimately open the door to greater Chinese influence over the global body, not less.

The upsides to the move are few, but some argue it could prompt further reforms of how the WHO works, meaning it better serves public health needs of people worldwide.

If that happens, it might be enough to tempt the US back into the fold. However, the tone of the language coming from Washington suggests this second attempt by President Trump to pull the US out of the international health body will not be reconsidered.