Meanwhile, on Thursday and again on Saturday, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hamas militants published disturbing videos of two emaciated Israeli hostages, sparking worldwide outrage and condemnation from UN leaders, including Secretary-General António Guterres on Monday.

The hostages pictured, Rom Braslavsk and Evyatar David, are two of the 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.

At Monday’s daily briefing in New York, UN Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq said the Secretary-General “was very shocked by this unacceptable violation of human dignity.”

UN rights chief Volker Türk added in a statement that he was appalled by the humiliating treatment of the hostages. Both he and the Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, Tom Fletcher, reiterated their call for an unconditional, immediate release of all hostages still being held since the 7 October terror attacks.

The High Commissioner said the “intolerable” sight of starvation in Gaza served as another reminder that the violence had to end. “Saving lives must be everyone’s priority.”

He called for Israel to immediately allow and facilitate rapid and unimpeded aid: “Denying civilians access to food may amount to a war crime, as well as potentially a crime against humanity.”

Attack on aid workers

On Sunday, the Israeli military reportedly struck the headquarters of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society in Khan Younis, killing one and injuring three other staff members.  

The facility is marked with the Red Crescent emblem and is thus protected under international humanitarian law.

The UN rights office (OHCHR) in Palestine expressed deep shock and outrage over these killings.

“These workers continue to engage in life-saving efforts putting their own lives at risk,” OHCHR said.

Aid entry  

Amid these controversies, the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, posted on social media on Saturday, saying that since Friday, the agency had brought 24 trucks with medical supplies into Gaza.  

Items included essential medicines, trauma and surgery supplies, treatments for non-communicable disease and laboratory and water testing supplies.  

Mr. Haq also highlighted on Monday that in recent days, the UN and its partners have collected wheat flour, ready-to-eat rations and hot meals from crossing points into Gaza, but most of the cargo was taken by the hungry and desperate before reaching intended destinations.

Additionally, hygiene kits and nutrition supplies, including high-energy biscuits for pregnant and breastfeeding women and infant formula, have entered in the past week.

However, in the second week since the Israeli announcement of tactical pauses to allow safe passages for UN aid convoys, Mr. Haq said realities on the ground remain largely the same.  

This includes many challenges to delivering aid, resulting in the impediment of two of the 11 missions on Sunday and the full passage of only seven.

Famine-like conditions

This aid is still a fraction of what is needed, as a catastrophic food crisis worsens across the Strip.  

The World Food Programme (WFP) said it “is doing everything possible to distribute vital food assistance to families,” but reported on Sunday that over half a million people in Gaza are enduring famine-like conditions.  

The UN aid agency for Palestinians (UNRWA) released an audio of Manar, an employee who works within Gaza, on Monday. She said that “food is never enough,” and that many walk in the heat for hours to search for food and medical supplies.

The Commissioner-General for UNRWA, Philippe Lazzarini, underscored that this near-famine is largely due to deliberate efforts to dismantle the UN-coordinated humanitarian system through the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which is responsible for the killing of nearly 1,400 starving Palestinians near its sites and convoy routes, according to Gaza’s health ministry.

Prioritising the GHF, Israel has prevented UNRWA – “the backbone of humanitarian response” – from bringing in assistance since 2 March, he said. 

Reuters

Reuters

For Gazans, a 60-day ceasefire being negotiated between Israel and Hamas would be a lifeline.

A window to bring in large quantities of desperately needed food, water and medicine after severe – and at times total – Israeli restrictions on aid deliveries.

But for Israel’s defence minister Israel Katz a two-month pause in military operations would create an opportunity to build what he has called a “humanitarian city” in the ruins of the southern city of Rafah to contain almost every single Gazan except those belonging to armed groups.

According to the plan, Palestinians would be security screened before being allowed in and not permitted to leave.

Critics, both domestically and internationally, have condemned the proposal, with human rights groups, academics and lawyers calling it a blueprint for a “concentration camp”.

It’s unclear to what extent it represents a concrete plan of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government or whether it is a negotiating tactic to put more pressure on Hamas in the talks on a ceasefire and hostage release deal.

In the notable absence of any Israeli plan for Gaza after the war ends, this idea is filling the strategic vacuum.

Katz briefed a group of Israeli reporters that the new camp would initially house about 600,000 Palestinians – and eventually the whole 2.1 million population.

His plan would see the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) securing the site from a distance while international bodies managed the area. Four aid distribution sites would be established in the area, he said.

Katz also restated his desire to encourage Palestinians to “voluntarily emigrate” from the Gaza to other countries.

But it has not gained traction or support among other senior figures in Israel, and according to reports the proposal even triggered a clash between the prime minister and the head of the IDF.

Israeli media say the office of the chief of the general staff, Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, made clear the army was not obligated to forcibly transfer civilians, as the plan would require.

It’s claimed Gen Zamir and Netanyahu were involved in an angry exchange during a recent war cabinet meeting.

Tal Schneider, a political correspondent at the centrist Times of Israel, said Zamir would be in a strong position to push back because the government “practically begged him to take the job” six months ago – and Netanyahu strongly endorsed his appointment.

It’s not only the top military brass that is opposed to the idea. There is also consternation among rank and file too.

“Any transfer of a civil population is a form of war crime, that’s a form of ethnic cleansing, which is also a form of genocide,” IDF reservist Yotam Vilk told the BBC at his home in Tel Aviv.

The 28-year-old former officer in the Armored Corps is refusing to serve any longer in the army following 270 days of active combat in Gaza.

He describes himself as a patriot and argues Israel must defend itself but that the current war has no strategy nor end in sight.

Vilk is also part of Soldiers for the Hostages, a group calling for an end of the war to secure the release of the 50 Israelis still being held captive by Hamas in Gaza, up to 20 of whom are believed to be alive.

Meanwhile 16 Israeli experts in international law issued a joint letter on Friday denouncing the plan, which they said would constitute a war crime. The letter urged “all relevant parties to publicly withdraw from the plan, renounce it and refrain from carrying it out”.

The plan has unsurprisingly dismayed Palestinians in Gaza.

“We completely reject this proposal, and we reject the displacement of any Palestinian from their land,” Sabreen, who had been forced to leave Khan Younis, told the BBC. “We are steadfast and will remain here until our last breath.”

Ahmad Al Mghayar from Rafah said: “Freedom is above everything. This is our land, we should be free to move wherever we want. Why are we being pressured like this?”

It’s not clear how much support Katz’s plan has among the general public, but recent surveys have indicated the majority of Jews in Israel favour the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza.

One poll published in the left-wing daily newspaper Haaretz claimed as many as 82 per cent of Jewish Israelis supported such a move.

But there has been curious lack of public support for the proposal among the far-right, including prominent ministers in the coalition Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.

Both have been vocal proponents of Palestinians leaving Gaza and Jewish settlers returning.

Tal Schneider said both ministers may still be weighing up giving their backing to the proposal for a mass camp.

“Maybe they’re waiting to see where the wind blows to see if it’s serious. Both Smotrich and Ben-Gvir are cabinet members and have more access to internal discussions. Maybe they think this is just to put political pressure on Hamas to come to the table.”

Outside Israel, the proposal for a new camp for all Gazans has attracted widespread criticism.

In the UK, minister for the Middle East Hamish Falconer posted on social media that he was “appalled” by the plan.

“Palestinian territory must not be reduced,” he wrote. “Civilians must be able to return to their communities. We need to move towards a ceasefire deal and open a pathway to lasting peace.”

British human rights lawyer Baroness Helena Kennedy KC told the BBC the project would force Palestinians into a “concentration camp”.

The description, which other critics including academics, NGOs and senior UN officials have used, holds considerable resonance in light of the role of concentration camps in the Holocaust.

Baroness Kennedy said the plan – as well as the latest actions of Israel – has led her to conclude Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

“I was very reluctant to go there, because the threshold has to be very high. There has to be specific intent for genocide. But what we’re now seeing is genocidal behaviour,” she said.

Israel has vehemently rejected the charge of genocide and says it does not target civilians.

The Israeli foreign ministry also told the BBC that “the notion that Israel is creating concentration camps is deeply offensive and draws parallels with the Nazis”. Israel “adheres to the Geneva Convention”, it added, referring to the international regulations governing the treatment of civilians in occupied territories.

Aside from grim warnings about what might happen, the prospect of a new camp is having an impact on efforts to end the Gaza war.

Palestinian sources at the ceasefire talks grinding on in the Qatari capital Doha have told the BBC the plan has alarmed the Hamas delegation and has created a new obstacle to a deal.

Additional reporting by Joyce Liu and John Landy

For Gazans, a 60-day ceasefire being negotiated between Israel and Hamas would be a lifeline.

A window to bring in large quantities of desperately needed food, water and medicine after severe – and at times total – Israeli restrictions on aid deliveries.

But for Israel’s defence minister Israel Katz a two-month pause in military operations would create an opportunity to build what he has called a “humanitarian city” in the ruins of the southern city of Rafah to contain almost every single Gazan except those belonging to armed groups.

According to the plan, Palestinians would be security screened before being allowed in and not permitted to leave.

Critics, both domestically and internationally, have condemned the proposal, with human rights groups, academics and lawyers calling it a blueprint for a “concentration camp”.

It’s unclear to what extent it represents a concrete plan of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government or whether it is a negotiating tactic to put more pressure on Hamas in the talks on a ceasefire and hostage release deal.

In the notable absence of any Israeli plan for Gaza after the war ends, this idea is filling the strategic vacuum.

Katz briefed a group of Israeli reporters that the new camp would initially house about 600,000 Palestinians – and eventually the whole 2.1 million population.

His plan would see the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) securing the site from a distance while international bodies managed the area. Four aid distribution sites would be established in the area, he said.

Katz also restated his desire to encourage Palestinians to “voluntarily emigrate” from the Gaza to other countries.

But it has not gained traction or support among other senior figures in Israel, and according to reports the proposal even triggered a clash between the prime minister and the head of the IDF.

Israeli media say the office of the chief of the general staff, Lt Gen Eyal Zamir, made clear the army was not obligated to forcibly transfer civilians, as the plan would require.

It’s claimed Gen Zamir and Netanyahu were involved in an angry exchange during a recent war cabinet meeting.

Tal Schneider, a political correspondent at the centrist Times of Israel, said Zamir would be in a strong position to push back because the government “practically begged him to take the job” six months ago – and Netanyahu strongly endorsed his appointment.

It’s not only the top military brass that is opposed to the idea. There is also consternation among rank and file too.

“Any transfer of a civil population is a form of war crime, that’s a form of ethnic cleansing, which is also a form of genocide,” IDF reservist Yotam Vilk told the BBC at his home in Tel Aviv.

The 28-year-old former officer in the Armored Corps is refusing to serve any longer in the army following 270 days of active combat in Gaza.

He describes himself as a patriot and argues Israel must defend itself but that the current war has no strategy nor end in sight.

Vilk is also part of Soldiers for the Hostages, a group calling for an end of the war to secure the release of the 50 Israelis still being held captive by Hamas in Gaza, up to 20 of whom are believed to be alive.

Meanwhile 16 Israeli experts in international law issued a joint letter on Friday denouncing the plan, which they said would constitute a war crime. The letter urged “all relevant parties to publicly withdraw from the plan, renounce it and refrain from carrying it out”.

The plan has unsurprisingly dismayed Palestinians in Gaza.

“We completely reject this proposal, and we reject the displacement of any Palestinian from their land,” Sabreen, who had been forced to leave Khan Younis, told the BBC. “We are steadfast and will remain here until our last breath.”

Ahmad Al Mghayar from Rafah said: “Freedom is above everything. This is our land, we should be free to move wherever we want. Why are we being pressured like this?”

It’s not clear how much support Katz’s plan has among the general public, but recent surveys have indicated the majority of Jews in Israel favour the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza.

One poll published in the left-wing daily newspaper Haaretz claimed as many as 82 per cent of Jewish Israelis supported such a move.

But there has been curious lack of public support for the proposal among the far-right, including prominent ministers in the coalition Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.

Both have been vocal proponents of Palestinians leaving Gaza and Jewish settlers returning.

Tal Schneider said both ministers may still be weighing up giving their backing to the proposal for a mass camp.

“Maybe they’re waiting to see where the wind blows to see if it’s serious. Both Smotrich and Ben-Gvir are cabinet members and have more access to internal discussions. Maybe they think this is just to put political pressure on Hamas to come to the table.”

Outside Israel, the proposal for a new camp for all Gazans has attracted widespread criticism.

In the UK, minister for the Middle East Hamish Falconer posted on social media that he was “appalled” by the plan.

“Palestinian territory must not be reduced,” he wrote. “Civilians must be able to return to their communities. We need to move towards a ceasefire deal and open a pathway to lasting peace.”

British human rights lawyer Baroness Helena Kennedy KC told the BBC the project would force Palestinians into a “concentration camp”.

The description, which other critics including academics, NGOs and senior UN officials have used, holds considerable resonance in light of the role of concentration camps in the Holocaust.

Baroness Kennedy said the plan – as well as the latest actions of Israel – has led her to conclude Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

“I was very reluctant to go there, because the threshold has to be very high. There has to be specific intent for genocide. But what we’re now seeing is genocidal behaviour,” she said.

Israel has vehemently rejected the charge of genocide and says it does not target civilians.

The Israeli foreign ministry also told the BBC that “the notion that Israel is creating concentration camps is deeply offensive and draws parallels with the Nazis”. Israel “adheres to the Geneva Convention”, it added, referring to the international regulations governing the treatment of civilians in occupied territories.

Aside from grim warnings about what might happen, the prospect of a new camp is having an impact on efforts to end the Gaza war.

Palestinian sources at the ceasefire talks grinding on in the Qatari capital Doha have told the BBC the plan has alarmed the Hamas delegation and has created a new obstacle to a deal.

Additional reporting by Joyce Liu and John Landy

Reports indicate that the latest Russian strikes damaged 12 buildings in the capital, causing widespread damage to homes, businesses and key services, while phones have been heard ringing from the rubble.

Other Ukrainian cities targeted included Zhytomyr – due west of Kyiv – and the northeastern cities of Sumy –  where a daytime missile strike killed at least 34 people on 13 April – and Kharkiv – where the authorities reported 24 drone and missile strikes in total.

“The casualty count is expected to rise as emergency teams continue search-and-rescue operations amid,” said the UN aid coordination office, OCHA.

The development follows Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s reported decision on Wednesday to reject a US-led proposal to seek a peace deal with Russia that would have involved ceding territory lost during the war. In theory, this would include the eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, in addition to Crimea, which Russia annexed illegally in 2014.

“Last night’s large-scale attack by the armed forces of the Russian Federation on residential areas in Kyiv and surrounding regions is yet another appalling violation of international humanitarian law,” said the UN’s top aid official in Ukraine, Matthias Schmale.

Children and a pregnant woman were among the more than 70 people injured by Wednesday night’s reported missile and drone strikes. “This senseless use of force must stop… Civilians must never be targets”, insisted Mr. Schmale, UN Humanitarian Coordinator for Ukraine.

Echoing that message, the UN Children’s Fund, UNICEF, appealed for an end to the use of explosive weapons in civilian areas.

State and city officials in Ohio have condemned a disturbing display of hate after a small group of individuals marched through Columbus on Saturday waving Nazi flags and shouting racial slurs and white supremacist slogans. The march, which took place in the bustling Short North neighborhood, shocked residents and quickly became a focal point for online outrage.

The group of approximately a dozen masked individuals carried swastika-adorned banners and used a bullhorn to amplify their hate-filled rhetoric against people of color and Jewish communities. Though their numbers were small, their actions sent ripples far beyond the city, drawing swift denunciations from public officials, advocacy groups, and citizens.

Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, a Republican, issued a firm statement on X (formerly Twitter):
“Neo-Nazis — their faces hidden behind red masks — roamed streets in Columbus today, carrying Nazi flags and spewing vile and racist speech against people of color and Jews. There is no place in this state for hate, bigotry, antisemitism, or violence, and we must denounce it wherever we see it.”

Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther also responded, emphasizing the city’s commitment to diversity and inclusion.
“Our community is stronger because of our diversity,” Ginther said in a statement. “We unequivocally reject the hate displayed in our streets today. Columbus will not tolerate such acts of racism and antisemitism.”

Other state officials joined the chorus of condemnation, with bipartisan agreement that such hateful demonstrations have no place in Ohio. Civil rights organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), echoed these sentiments, calling for vigilance against the rising tide of white supremacist activities.

The marchers targeted the Short North neighborhood, a vibrant area known for its restaurants, art galleries, and newly built apartments. Videos shared on social media showed the group shouting invectives through a bullhorn as stunned onlookers recorded the scene. Several residents reported feeling threatened and deeply disturbed by the display.

“I was out with friends for brunch, and suddenly we saw these people marching with swastikas,” said Jessica Martinez, a local resident. “It was terrifying. They were yelling at anyone who looked different.”

The ADL identified the Columbus march as part of a broader trend in extremist activity. Oren Segal, vice president of the ADL Center on Extremism, noted that such events are often small and unannounced to minimize resistance from counter-protesters.

“These marches are tailor-made for social media,” Segal explained. “Their goal is to amplify hate, provoke fear, and attract attention online.”

The march in Columbus reflects a troubling nationwide surge in white supremacist activity. According to the ADL, hundreds of similar incidents have occurred across the United States in the past 18 months. The rise in such demonstrations has been fueled by the strategic use of social media to disseminate propaganda and recruit followers.

“Extremist groups are becoming more sophisticated in their methods,” said Rachel Klein, a researcher at the SPLC. “They’re using these events to gain visibility and spread their toxic ideology to a broader audience.”

In 2023 alone, the ADL tracked a significant increase in public displays of hate, including marches, flyering campaigns, and online propaganda. These activities often coincide with major political events or cultural flashpoints, aiming to exploit societal divisions.

While the march was brief and no physical violence was reported, law enforcement officials in Columbus are investigating the incident. The Columbus Division of Police issued a statement acknowledging the public’s concerns and affirming their commitment to ensuring safety and security.

“We take incidents like this very seriously,” the department said. “While the First Amendment protects free speech, including offensive speech, we remain vigilant against any actions that may lead to violence or harm.”

Legal experts note that while hate speech is protected under the U.S. Constitution, any acts of intimidation or incitement to violence can cross the line into criminal behavior. Advocacy groups have called for increased monitoring of extremist groups to prevent future incidents.

In the aftermath of Saturday’s march, the Columbus community has rallied together to reject the hateful message displayed by the neo-Nazi group. Local organizations and activists quickly organized counter-messages, emphasizing the city’s commitment to inclusion and tolerance.

“Our city is better than this,” said Sarah Ahmed, a leader of a local interfaith coalition. “We stand united against hate and bigotry. This is not who we are.”

Planned responses include a solidarity march scheduled for next weekend, bringing together diverse community members to celebrate unity and denounce extremism. Faith leaders, civic groups, and local businesses have pledged their support for the event, which organizers hope will draw a larger and more positive crowd than the neo-Nazi demonstration.

Experts caution that while it’s crucial to denounce such displays, the widespread sharing of videos and images of the march can inadvertently amplify the group’s hateful message. Extremist groups often rely on this dynamic to reach audiences far beyond the immediate vicinity of their events.

“It’s a double-edged sword,” said Klein of the SPLC. “We need to expose and condemn these actions, but we must also be careful not to give these groups the publicity they crave.”

To counter this, advocacy organizations encourage communities to focus on positive messaging and education. Highlighting stories of resilience and unity can undermine the divisive narrative that extremist groups aim to promote.

The Columbus incident has reignited discussions about the need for stronger measures to combat hate groups. Advocacy groups are urging lawmakers to prioritize legislation that addresses domestic extremism, including increased funding for monitoring and counter-extremism programs.

“There’s no quick fix to this problem,” said Segal of the ADL. “But we can start by taking these threats seriously and ensuring that our communities are prepared to respond.”

Public officials have also called for increased public awareness and education to combat the spread of extremist ideologies. Schools, community organizations, and local governments all have a role to play in fostering a culture of understanding and inclusivity.

As Columbus grapples with the aftermath of the neo-Nazi march, residents are reaffirming their commitment to building a welcoming and inclusive city. While the hateful display may have rattled the community, it has also galvanized a broad coalition of voices determined to stand against bigotry.

“Our strength lies in our diversity,” said Ahmed. “Hate will not win. We will continue to fight for a community where everyone feels safe and valued.”

The solidarity march planned for next weekend is expected to be a powerful display of unity, offering a stark contrast to the hate that briefly disrupted the city. For many in Columbus, it will be a chance to reclaim their streets and demonstrate that their community stands firmly on the side of justice and equality.