Categories: Top Stories

Trump’s Iran announcement may ease pressure but uncertainty lingers


The announcement of a deal to end hostilities between the US and Iran has provided Donald Trump with a very welcome birthday present – although it’s wrapped in a fair measure of uncertainty.

The US president said in his social media post heralding the agreement that the Strait of Hormuz would be open to commercial shipping and the US would lift its naval blockade.

“Let the oil flow!” Trump exclaimed on Sunday.

He went on to declare that, in contrast with the failures of past US presidents, he secured a “great deal” that would bring “peace and security to the whole region”.

Such hyperbole is nothing new for Trump, of course. His declarations about last year’s agreement ending the Gaza War – “a peace for all eternity” and the “beginning of the age of faith and hope and of God” – were equally sweeping, even as the reality on the ground has fallen far short.

In such high-stakes diplomatic agreements, success or failure usually hinges on the details. And here, the details are scarce.

US Vice-President JD Vance said in a Sunday evening interview with Fox News that Iran never possessing a nuclear weapon was “built into this agreement” and that the US will be able to verify compliance.

Yet questions remain over crucial issues including what the restrictions on enrichment will be and what should happen to the stockpile of highly enriched uranium Iran has now.

Some of this is sure to be worked out in subsequent negotiations and “technical” talks conducted during a 60-day extension of the current ceasefire. But if anything is clear after decades of efforts to cajole and coerce Iran into giving up its nuclear ambitions, it’s that there are no guarantees, no matter what the US believes is secured in this “memorandum of understanding”.

As if to underscore this point, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council released a statement on Sunday saying that “final negotiations will be postponed until after the implementation of the other party’s commitments under the memorandum”.

What those commitments are – and how Iran interprets them – will help determine whether this deal sticks.

Energy market experts warned that moving of oil through the strait is unlikely to immediately return to pre-war levels. Clearing a large backlog of tankers, removing mines and restoring regular oil shipping and production could take weeks.

With several days to go before the official signing, Iran and the US have time to settle key details to ensure the deal’s success – but there’s also time for it to fall apart.

Another wildcard is Israel.

This was always a three-party war, and Trump told the Wall Street Journal on Sunday that he was furious at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for ordering strikes on Lebanon this weekend that he believed might torpedo the almost-completed Iran deal.



Source link

gulftimes

Recent Posts

Trump envoy Kushner meets Hamas leader to push Gaza peace plan

Whilst in Egypt, Kushner also met Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. According to Israeli media…

21 hours ago

First Person: Syrians lead efforts to clear rubble and rebuild lives

The conflict there killed hundreds of thousands of people, displaced millions, and caused severe damage…

1 day ago

Gen Z women are teaching their mums about cycle syncing and periods

Iqra Wasim from Fishponds in Bristol has struggled with PMOS symptoms such as painful acne…

1 day ago

Men are turning to penis fillers, but are they safe?

Prof Vaibhav Modgil, an andrologist and consultant urological surgeon for the NHS in Manchester, has…

2 days ago

Qatar denies capturing three Iranian pilots after downing fighter jets

Iran has called for the release of three Iranian pilots it said were captured by…

2 days ago

Eleven killed in Israeli strikes on southern Lebanon, authorities say

Eleven people have been killed in Israeli strikes in southern Lebanon, authorities say, in one…

2 days ago